ArticlePsychiatry research2025
Do cognitive and neurophysiological effects of acute memantine "challenge" predict its clinical benefits in Alzheimer's Disease?
Article in Psychiatry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
"Personalized" interventions based on patients' "biomarkers" may be valuable for treatments that benefit only subsets of patients. The NMDA antagonist, memantine, slows clinical progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD); this effect is heterogeneous in magnitude and duration. This study tested whether acute cognitive or neurophysiological responses to memantine challenge predicted sensitivity to memantine's therapeutic effects. Thirty individuals with mild-to-moderate severity AD (M:F = 13:17) and 24 comparably aged healthy subjects (HCS) (M:F = 12:12) were enrolled. Participants with AD were characterized on 9 experimental measures and their changes after acute memantine "challenge" (20 mg). We then assessed whether acute memantine effects on these measures predicted clinical change over a 24-week open-label trial of memantine. Baseline cognitive (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status) and neurophysiological measures (prepulse inhibition, P3a latency and auditory steady state response power and coherence) were impaired in participants with AD (p's<0.05-0.0001); neurophysiological deficits were modestly reduced by acute memantine challenge. As a group, participants with AD showed no significant clinical changes across 24 weeks of memantine treatment; subgroups exhibited either small gains or deterioration. With one exception (mismatch negativity latency, p < 0.017), sensitivity of experimental measures to acute memantine challenge did not significantly predict clinical sensitivity to memantine. In summary, a challenge dose design identified neurophysiological measures sensitive to memantine in mild-to-moderate severity AD; acute memantine effects on one measure weakly predicted clinical outcomes over 24 weeks. Impairment in specific measures among participants with AD, and their opposition by memantine, might inform future efforts to identify treatment biomarkers in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.