ArticleResearch in developmental disabilities2025
Defining and measuring emotional well-being in intellectual and developmental disabilities: A scoping review.
Article in Research in developmental disabilities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis review aimed to compile and report on existing emotional well-being (EWB) subjective report measures that have been developed, adapted, or validated on individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).
methodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, this review searched three databases using search terms related to EWB, IDD, and measurement. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then reviewed the full texts to include articles that used an EWB-related measure, had an IDD sample, and reported psychometric evidence (% agreement = 97.41, k = 91.92). For each included article, two coders extracted data, and an item analysis was performed to identify EWB and non-EWB items included in each located measure.
resultsThis review identified 33 articles and 20 subjective report measures that were developed, adapted, or validated for individuals with IDD. Most existing measures focus on quality of life rather than treating EWB as a distinct, stand-alone construct, and include only a few EWB items. The included measures were mostly validated on adults and older adults with mild to moderate ID and show varying psychometric evidence across and within measures.
conclusionsThis review clarifies the current state of EWB measurement in individuals with IDD and provides an organized summary of existing EWB measures. These findings can guide the continued development of EWB research in the IDD population by identifying knowledge gaps and pointing to future directions. Findings also help inform the selection of subjective report measures for assessing EWB in individuals with IDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.