Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41045509›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Multi-view gene panel characterization for spatially resolved omics.

Daniel Kim, Wenze Ding, Akira Nguyen Shaw, Marni Torkel, Cameron J Turtle, Pengyi Yang, Jean Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel KimSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8405-6719
Wenze DingSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0940-2885
Akira Nguyen ShawSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marni TorkelSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cameron J TurtleSydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pengyi YangSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-3138
Jean YangSydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-2603

Funding

AIR@innoHK program of the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong KongAnthony Rothe Memorial TrustAustralian Commonwealth Government Research Training Program Stipend ScholarshipChan Zuckerberg Initiative Single Cell Biology Data Insights DI2-0000000197Children's Medical Research Institute Top up AwardCLEARbridge FoundationMetcalf Prize from National Stem Cell Foundation of AustraliaNational Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator APP2017023NHMRC 2033771NHMRC Investigator 1173469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially resolved transcriptomics has revolutionized the study of complex tissues by enabling cellular and subcellular resolution. However, targeted spatial technologies depend on pre-selected gene panels, which are typically curated based on prior biological knowledge or specific research hypotheses. While existing methods often focus on optimizing for cell type identification, we argue that effective panel design should also account for transcriptional variation, pathway-level coverage, and minimal gene redundancy. To meet these broader criteria, we developed a two-part framework: (i) panelScope, a gene panel characterization platform that characterizes panels from multiple perspectives, allowing for holistic comparisons of gene panels for custom panel design; and (ii) panelScope-OA, a genetic algorithm that integrates these characterization metrics into a multi-loss function to automate panel optimization. We applied panelScope and panelScope-OA to characterize nine panels across four datasets. Notably, computationally constructed gene panels performed competitively in capturing major cell types when compared to our in-house manually curated panel. However, refined manual curation offered distinct advantages, particularly in capturing minor cell types. Our results demonstrate the utility of panelScope and panelScope-OA by offering quantitative and multi-dimensional insights to support the design of panels tailored to diverse research needs.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsTranscriptomeAlgorithmsHumansgene panellarge language modelsmulti-objective optimizationspatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41045509
PMCPMC12495993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.