Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41045422›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Global regulatory variability in small-molecule inhibitor approvals: Differences in timelines, dosing, and pediatric indications across FDA, EMA, and PMDA.

Antía Gómez-Fernández, Alba Rubio-San-Simón, Sae Ishimaru, Jen-Hao Wu, C Michel Zwaan, Alwin D R Huitema, Francisco Bautista

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antía Gómez-FernándezClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain, 28006.
Alba Rubio-San-SimónDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Sae IshimaruPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jen-Hao WuPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C Michel ZwaanPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Francisco BautistaPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.j.bautistasirvent@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0421-8862

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSmall-molecule inhibitors have transformed oncology in recent years. This study compared regulatory approvals of these agents across the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), focusing on timelines, dosing recommendations, and pediatric labelling.

methodsA review of regulatory databases was conducted to identify small-molecule inhibitors approved for adult malignancies. Drug labels were compared to determine dosing concordance (Fully, Partially, or Non-Concordant), approval dates, and pediatric indications. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers.

resultsFifty-five inhibitors were approved by all three agencies. Adult dosing was Fully Concordant in 49 (89%), partially in 4 (7%), and Non-Concordant in 2 (4%). The median approval gap was 25 months (range: 1-88). FDA granted first approval for 85.5% of agents, followed by PMDA (12.7%) and EMA (1.8%). Among these 55 drugs, only 15 had pediatric indications (27%), 7 of them (46.7%) approved across all three regions. No complete divergence in pediatric dosing was observed, although minimum age thresholds varied. DISCUSSION: Despite strong alignment in adult dosing, regulatory disparities in approval timelines and pediatric labelling persist, risking delays in therapy availability. More harmonized multinational trials and regulatory alignment could facilitate timely approvals while allowing for population-specific considerations in dosing and safety.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug ApprovalNeoplasmsAdultChildDrug LabelingEuropeHumansJapanUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsDosing harmonizationFDA-EMA-PMDA comparisonGlobal drug developmentPediatric oncology indicationsRegulatory oncology approvalsSmall-molecule inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.