ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Anticipation of pain during operant learning increases cognitive performance and feedback-related cortical potentials.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operant conditioning (OC) evokes behavioral changes and may be useful in pain management. However, it is unknown how alteration of a tonic painful stimulus may affect cognitive performance in an OC learning task and the associated neural activity. To address this, specific event-related potentials (ERPs) and cognitive performance were assessed after an OC task, using altered pain intensity as the operant stimulus. Two OC paradigms were designed using painful tonic pressure pain as the conditioning stimulus. 29 healthy participants received individually set tonic pressure pain corresponding to visual analogue scale 5 (VAS5; pain threshold). Pressure was maintained and a cognitive task performance yielded reward or punishment. Consequences of correct and incorrect answers in the negative reinforcement (NR) condition were pain relief (VAS3) or no pressure change (VAS5), respectively, and no pressure change (VAS5) or increased pressure (VAS7) in the positive punishment (PP) condition, respectively. The initial condition (NR or PP) was randomized, and 120 trials were conducted in three same-day sessions. 64-channel electroencephalography was recorded, and auditory-feedback ERPs (P1N1, P2N2, P3N3) were extracted. Higher ERP peak-to-peak amplitudes were found when participants received feedback that their answer was incorrect. A small OC learning behavior effect was found across trials with no difference between NR and PP. Independent of OC paradigm, learning behavior was induced, and ERP complex amplitudes increased when incorrect answers were given. These novel findings show that higher pain expectancy due to an incorrect answer, facilitated feedback-related ERPs when using pain as a conditioning stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.