Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41045402›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on years of life lost in radical cystectomy-treated T2N0M0 bladder cancer patients.

Mattia Longoni, Fabian Falkenbach, Andrea Marmiroli, Quynh Chi Le, Michele Nicolazzini, Calogero Catanzaro, Federico Polverino, Jordan A Goyal, Markus Graefen, Matteo Ferro and 12 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Mattia LongoniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada. longoni.mattia@hsr.it.
Fabian FalkenbachCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Andrea MarmiroliCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Quynh Chi LeCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Michele NicolazziniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Calogero CatanzaroCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Federico PolverinoCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Jordan A GoyalCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matteo FerroUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, University of Milan, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Felix K H ChunDepartment of Urology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Alessandro VolpeDivision of Urology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy.
Riccardo SchiavinaDepartment of Urology, University of Bologna, St. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Nicola LongoDepartment of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Leonardo QuartaDivision of Experimental Oncology, Unit of UrologyUrological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Marco MoschiniDivision of Experimental Oncology, Unit of UrologyUrological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio GandagliaDivision of Experimental Oncology, Unit of UrologyUrological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Experimental Oncology, Unit of UrologyUrological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Experimental Oncology, Unit of UrologyUrological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitDivision of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is standard of care for T2N0M0 urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (UCUB) patients. However, the effect of NAC on years of life lost (YLL) in RC-treated T2N0M0 patients has never been quantified.

methodsWithin the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2021), T2N0M0 UCUB patients aged 40-75 years treated with RC, with or without NAC, were included. Relying on Social Security Administration (SSA) life tables, an age/sex-matched control (Monte Carlo simulation) was simulated for each patient. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate average YLL until the age of 75 years between SEER cases and SSA simulated controls.

resultsOverall, 1511 (27.8%) T2N0M0 UCUB patients treated with RC + NAC and 3932 (72.2%) with RC alone were identified. Compared to simulated population controls, RC + NAC vs. RC alone patients exhibited 1.3 vs. 2.3 YLL. In sensitivity analyses according to age at diagnosis, the most pronounced YLL values were recorded in youngest patients (40-55 years): RC + NAC: 2.2 YLL vs. RC alone: 6.1 YLL. Intermediate YLL values were recorded in intermediate age patients (56-65 years): RC + NAC: 1.9 YLL vs. RC alone: 3.2 YLL. Finally, the least pronounced YLL values were recorded in oldest patients (66-75 years): RC + NAC: 0.4 YLL vs. RC alone: 0.7 YLL. Invariably, RC alone was associated with higher YLL values than RC + NAC.

conclusionWhen YLL represented the endpoint, RC + NAC patients exhibited more favorable outcomes than RC alone patients. In both RC + NAC and RC alone groups maximal YLL applied to youngest individuals and decreased in proportion to increasing age.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellCystectomyLife ExpectancyNeoadjuvant TherapyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSEER ProgramBladder cancerMuscle-invasiveSurvivalYears of life lost

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.