ArticleGenes & genomics2025
PSM-SMOTE: propensity score matching and synthetic minority oversampling for handling unbalanced microbiome data.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredictive models using microbiome data often suffer from covariate imbalance and class imbalance, biasing results. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) balances covariates but reduces sample size, while borderline synthetic minority oversampling technique (borderline-SMOTE) oversamples minority classes but can generate uninformative examples.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate PSM-SMOTE, a novel hybrid sampling method that integrates PSM and borderline-SMOTE to handle both covariate and class imbalance in microbiome data.
methodsWe developed PSM-SMOTE, a three-step hybrid sampling algorithm for microbiome data: (1) PSM at four caliper levels to balance covariates, (2) selection of at least ten robust differential markers via seven statistical tests with false discovery rate correction, and (3) application of borderline-SMOTE on the marker-based distance matrix to oversample minority classes. We evaluated PSM-SMOTE on three publicly available microbiome case-control datasets: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and obesity, using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Performance was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC).
resultsPSM-SMOTE improved test AUCs in multiple model-dataset combinations compared with using PSM alone. Notably, for the RF model, PSM-SMOTE consistently enhanced AUC across nearly all oversampling settings in the PDAC and obesity cohorts. For the SVM model, PSM-SMOTE also achieved a significant AUC increase in the CRC cohort. For the LR model, PSM-SMOTE showed modest improvement under strict matching.
conclusionPSM-SMOTE effectively addresses dual imbalance in microbiome data and consistently enhances performance, providing a practical solution for imbalanced data analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41045399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.