ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Iron, manganese, and copper complexes protect saccharomyces cerevisiae from methyl methanesulfonate-induced genotoxicity and oxidative stress.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) is a well-known classical alkylating agent that induces DNA damage, mutagenesis, and cell dysfunction. Alternatives to mitigate the damage caused by MMS are essential for understanding DNA repair mechanisms and developing approaches to reduce mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents. This study explores the potential of synthetic antioxidants containing iron (1), manganese (2), or copper (3) to protect Saccharomyces cerevisiae from MMS-induced damage. The wild type strain, BY4741, and its isogenic DNA-repair mutants rad9Δ and rad54Δ strains were used to investigate whether these complexes effectively mitigate yeast susceptibility, mitochondrial dysfunction, intracellular oxidation, and mutagenesis caused by MMS. The results demonstrate that all complexes significantly enhanced the survival rates of all fungal strains, indicating their protective role against MMS-induced DNA damage. Additionally, MMS exposure increased mitochondrial dysfunction, intracellular oxidation, and canavanine-based mutagenesis, which was subsequently reduced by the treatment with the complexes, indicating their ability to mitigate oxidative stress and genotoxicity caused by MMS. Among the tested compounds, complex 3 conferred the greatest protective effect against MMS-induced cellular damage, followed by complexes 2 and 1, establishing a consistent order of efficacy: 3 > 2 > 1. These findings demonstrate that the coordination compounds employed in this study effectively protected S. cerevisiae against MMS-induced toxicity, highlighting their potential role in enhancing cellular defense against genotoxic agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41045319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.