ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Myocardial Structural and Functional Assessment in Fetal Growth Restriction Infants-A Cohort Study.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myocardial Structural and Functional Assessment in Fetal Growth Restriction Infants-A Cohort Study: Authors' Reply.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Myocardial Structural and Functional Assessment in Fetal Growth Restriction Infants-A Cohort Study: Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, cardiac changes and catch-up growth were assessed in neonates with fetal growth restriction (FGR) over six months. A total of 77 FGR and 73 adequate-for-gestational age (AGA) neonates underwent biophysical profiling and echocardiographic assessment, including myocardial deformation analysis, within the first week of life. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at six months. Findings revealed that FGR neonates had smaller cardiac dimensions and reduced myocardial function, with significantly lower left ventricular global longitudinal strain and early diastolic strain rate, despite preserved ejection fraction. These abnormalities persisted at six months, even as biophysical profiles approached normal. However, the improvement in myocardial deformation was still lower than in AGA neonates, indicating ongoing subclinical myocardial dysfunction. The study highlights that while FGR infants may show catch-up growth, underlying cardiac functional differences remain, emphasizing the importance of long-term cardiac monitoring in this population to detect subtle but significant functional impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41045304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.