ArticleESC heart failure2025
Percutaneous endocardial alginate-hydrogel injection in the treatment of heart failure: First-in-human study.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Percutaneous endocardial alginate-hydrogel injection in the treatment of heart failure: First-in-human study.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDespite the potential of alginate hydrogel intramyocardial injections in the treatment of heart failure (HF), minimally invasive implantation techniques remain scarce. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of percutaneous transcatheter endocardial alginate hydrogel injection (TEAi), facilitated by novel implants and a dedicated catheter-based device, in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND
resultsThis first-in-human study enrolled HFrEF patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III-IV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%]. The primary endpoint was the incidence of procedure- or device-related serious adverse events (SADEs) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included the device success rate, HF hospitalization at 6 months, and change from baseline to 6 months post-procedure in the following parameters: LVEF as assessed by MRI; NYHA functional class; 6 min walk test distance (6MWT); the quality of life assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Heart Failure Questionnaire (KCCQ); and serum N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. Pre- and post-procedural biomechanical analysis was also evaluated. Ten patients successfully underwent TEAi with no SADEs at 30 days. There was one death and two HF hospitalizations at 6 months. At 6 months, LVEF improved from 17.7% ± 3.8% to 24.9% ± 11.2% (P = 0.021), end-systolic volume decreased from 297.5 ± 67.9 mL to 264.8 ± 101.4 mL (P = 0.029), and KCCQ scores increased from 49.7 ± 3.9 to 79.0 ± 8.07 (P = 0.008). No statistically significant changes were observed in end-diastolic volume, NT-proBNP and 6MWT at six months compared with the baseline. Biomechanical analysis revealed a reduction in peak left ventricular end-diastolic wall stress (6.5 ± 1.1 kPa vs. 5.9 ± 1.3 kPa, P = 0.043).
conclusionsTEAi is feasible and safe for the treatment of HFrEF, warranting further randomized, efficacy clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.