ReviewESC heart failure2025
Worsening versus advanced heart failure: Management and challenges.
Review in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond 'warm and wet': refining congestion phenotypes within the Nohria-Stevenson framework in acute heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Ambulatory low cardiac output state in heart failure: characteristics and outcomes.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Indication for durable mechanical circulatory support: an expert opinion review.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Landmark clinical trials shaping contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Worse long-term outcomes in new-onset HFpEF vs HFrEF and HFmrEF: findings from the Stockholm PREFERS study.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Worsening heart failure-based hierarchical endpoints beyond HF hospitalization: expert opinion paper.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Liver Function Abnormalities in Acute Heart Failure: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- A Contemporary Perspective on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Classification: A State-of-the-art Review from an International Expert Group.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Worsening versus advanced heart failure: Management and challenges.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition marked by recurrent episodes of symptom exacerbation, leading to worsening cardiac function, increased hospitalization and mortality risk. Worsening HF (WHF) and advanced HF (AdvHF) represent two distinct stages in this progression, each with unique clinical features and therapeutic needs. WHF is characterized by a deterioration of pre-existing symptoms requiring intensified treatment, such as diuretic escalation, which often reflects disease progression. Conversely, AdvHF involves severe cardiac dysfunction with persistent symptoms despite optimal medical management, requiring advanced interventions such as inotropic support or heart transplant. Although both stages share some pathophysiological and clinical features, they differ significantly in haemodynamic profiles, disease severity and response to treatment. This review argues that recognizing the transition from WHF to AdvHF is a pivotal issue in patient care. We explore the distinct natural histories, clinical presentations and diagnostic markers of WHF and AdvHF to provide a framework for earlier, more targeted interventions aimed at altering the disease trajectory and preventing the decline associated with the advanced stage. While WHF symptoms are typically reversible with appropriate interventions, AdvHF represents the end stage of HF with often irreversible dysfunction and multi-organ involvement. A clearer understanding and standardized definition of these phenotypes are essential for improving patient outcomes and guiding future clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.