ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Do offspring characteristics reflect parental migration variation?
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sea trout, Salmo trutta, display a wide range of migratory behaviours, and one aspect of variation comes from freshwater migration distance. The overall aim of this study was to determine if offspring of long- and short-distance migrants exhibited phenotypic differences relating to parental migration distance. For that purpose, we conducted several behavioural tests (dyadic contest, boldness scoring and open field test) and morphological analysis (relative pectoral-fin length) in multiple freshwater systems across the distribution range of the target species in Europe. It was expected that offspring of long-distance migrants would be more active, bold and dominant than those of short-distance migrants and would have longer pectoral fins relative to body length. Additionally, we investigated if boldness varied in relation to latitude. We showed that offspring of long-distance migrants were more dominant in two cases and more active in one case than those of short-distance migrants; however, there was no difference in swimming distance or velocity. Boldness and relative pectoral-fin length were significantly related to site of origin; however, the direction of this relationship differed between systems. Generally, we detected a decrease in boldness with declining latitude. In summary, we have detected variation among juveniles related to location within a stream; however, the drivers and processes behind these are likely more complex than purely parental migratory strategy. Our results can inform suitable management and conservation efforts directed to anadromous Salmo trutta. For example, habitat restoration and removal of migration barriers can increase the possible range of migration distances helping maintain the phenotypic diversity of offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.