ArticleFEBS open bio2026
Thrombolytic proteins profiling: High-throughput activity, selectivity, and resistance assays.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid screening of staphylokinase protein variants using an unpurified cell-free expression system.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Highlights of the FEBS3+ meeting Exploring molecular frontiers.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases, including thrombotic events such as ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction, are among the leading causes of morbidity and disability worldwide. The application of clot-dissolving thrombolytic enzymes is a cost-effective therapeutic intervention for these life-threatening conditions. However, the effectiveness and safety profiles of current drugs are suboptimal, necessitating the discovery of new medicines or the engineering and enhancement of the existing ones. Here, we present a set of optimized biochemical protocols that allow robust screening and the therapeutic potential assessment of thrombolytic biomolecules. The assays provide information on multiple characteristics such as enzymatic activity, fibrinolysis rate, fibrin and fibrinogen stimulation, fibrin selectivity, clot binding affinity, and inhibition resistance. Such detailed characterization enables a rapid and reliable evaluation of candidate effectiveness and provides an indication of biological half-life, associated bleeding complications, and other side effects. We demonstrate the credibility of the methodology by applying it to the two most widely used thrombolytic drugs: alteplase (Activase®/Actilyse®) and tenecteplase (Metalyse®/TNKase®). Consistent with previous studies, tenecteplase exhibited increased fibrin selectivity and inhibition resistance, which explains its extended half-life. Our findings reinforce the growing consensus that tenecteplase may be a superior alternative to alteplase for thrombolytic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.