ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2025
A Qualitative Study of Health Priorities of People With Dementia and Care Partners in Emergency Department and Hospital Care in a Public Safety-Net Setting.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disposition at Equipoise: A Qualitative Study of Emergency Physicians' Decision-Making About Hospitalizing People With Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Communicating Across Languages: Experiences of Spanish-Speaking People With Dementia and Care Partners in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study of Health Priorities of People With Dementia and Care Partners in Emergency Department and Hospital Care in a Public Safety-Net Setting.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver half of the people with dementia visit the emergency department (ED) each year. Little is known about how people with dementia and their care partners conceptualize or communicate about health outcome goals or care preferences during acute care episodes. PARTICIPANTS AND
settingWe conducted interviews with 14 Hispanic people with dementia and 19 care partners recruited from a public safety net hospital system in the southeastern United States. Participants were community-dwelling and had recently visited the ED.
methodsWe used a qualitative study design informed by phenomenology and guided by the patient priorities care (PPC) framework. Interviews elicited patients' health priorities, including their care preferences and health outcome goals, as well as their experiences communicating with ED and hospital care teams. We used a deductive content analysis to identify health priorities and inductive thematic analysis regarding communication experiences.
resultsWe identified three key themes. First, participants' health priorities were grounded in values of maintaining social connection and independence. Second, hospitalizations were distressing, disorienting, and physically burdensome for both patients and care partners, leading to preferences to avoid admission whenever possible. Third, communication with ED and hospital teams felt unidirectional, with care plans delivered rather than discussed. Participants felt that care preferences were rarely elicited or incorporated into clinical decision-making.
conclusionsHospital admission is a critical decision point during acute care episodes for people with dementia. Incorporating brief conversations about health priorities at this juncture may improve alignment between emergency care and what matters most to patients and care partners. Adapting existing frameworks like PPC for time-pressured acute care settings may help promote shared decision-making about hospital admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.