Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044989›Full record

ReviewANZ journal of surgery2025

The Pregnant Surgeon: Welcoming the Advanced Ergonomics of Robotic Surgery.

Ashley Jenkin, Kim-Chi Phan-Thien, Carina Chow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley JenkinDepartment of Surgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-3154
Kim-Chi Phan-ThienDepartment of Surgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Carina ChowDepartment of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detrimental effect of poor operative ergonomics in surgery cannot be underestimated. It's associated with negative outcomes such as increased burn-out, fatigue, clinically relevant pain, and early retirement. Pregnancy creates additional challenges for female surgeons to prevent injury while adjusting to anthropometric changes that are difficult to accommodate for using open and laparoscopic surgical techniques. The robotic platform has been associated with improved ergonomic capabilities while maintaining dexterity and access. Robotic surgery will likely chaperone in a new era of possibility for female surgeons in particular of career longevity, reduced leave requirements, and improved comfort while operating pre- and post-partum.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyPregnancyergonomicoccupational hazardpregnancyrobotsurgery

Identifiers

PMID41044989
PMCPMC12717486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.