ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Challenges in zero-flow blood pressure as a measure of mean circulatory filling pressure: Experimental and computational perspectives.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mean circulatory filling pressure-physiological rationale and methodological considerations.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Challenges in zero-flow blood pressure as a measure of mean circulatory filling pressure: Experimental and computational perspectives.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP) is a foundational hemodynamic concept, representing the average circulatory pressure in a no-flow state and used to assess volume status and venous return. However, its measurement and clinical relevance remain debated. In this study, zero-flow pressures were recorded in 14 healthy pigs following cardiac arrest. Measurements were taken for 10 min in the abdominal aorta and right atrium under two conditions: cardiac arrest induced by pentobarbital overdose or by ventricular fibrillation (VF), with half of the VF animals rendered hypovolemic. A validated computational model of cardiovascular physiology was used to simulate these scenarios. Pentobarbital caused a rapid pressure equilibration, with mean arterial pressure (MAP) falling from 47 ± 3.7 to 16 ± 2.5 mm Hg. In contrast, VF produced a dynamic pressure response: MAP dropped from 53 ± 4.7 to 17 ± 2.2 mm Hg while central venous pressure rose, producing a persistent retrograde pressure gradient (5 ± 2.1 mm Hg). In silico simulations closely matched these dynamics (normalized RMSE <5%) and confirmed the influence of reflex mechanisms. These results challenge the idea of MCFP as a stable, universal value. Zero-flow pressures depend heavily on arrest method and reflexes, and computational modeling offers a valuable, ethical alternative to animal-based investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.