Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044906›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

Challenges in zero-flow blood pressure as a measure of mean circulatory filling pressure: Experimental and computational perspectives.

L M van Loon, M P Mulder, D van Dort, J G van der Hoeven, D W Donker, J Lemson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L M van LoonCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8259-2497
M P MulderCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
D van DortDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
D W DonkerCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J LemsonDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development) 11140012510002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP) is a foundational hemodynamic concept, representing the average circulatory pressure in a no-flow state and used to assess volume status and venous return. However, its measurement and clinical relevance remain debated. In this study, zero-flow pressures were recorded in 14 healthy pigs following cardiac arrest. Measurements were taken for 10 min in the abdominal aorta and right atrium under two conditions: cardiac arrest induced by pentobarbital overdose or by ventricular fibrillation (VF), with half of the VF animals rendered hypovolemic. A validated computational model of cardiovascular physiology was used to simulate these scenarios. Pentobarbital caused a rapid pressure equilibration, with mean arterial pressure (MAP) falling from 47 ± 3.7 to 16 ± 2.5 mm Hg. In contrast, VF produced a dynamic pressure response: MAP dropped from 53 ± 4.7 to 17 ± 2.2 mm Hg while central venous pressure rose, producing a persistent retrograde pressure gradient (5 ± 2.1 mm Hg). In silico simulations closely matched these dynamics (normalized RMSE <5%) and confirmed the influence of reflex mechanisms. These results challenge the idea of MCFP as a stable, universal value. Zero-flow pressures depend heavily on arrest method and reflexes, and computational modeling offers a valuable, ethical alternative to animal-based investigations.

Indexed as

Blood PressureHeart ArrestHemodynamicsModels, CardiovascularAnimalsAorta, AbdominalArterial PressureComputer SimulationSwineVentricular Fibrillationbaroreflexcomputational physiological modelingfluid therapyhemodynamicsvenous return

Identifiers

PMID41044906
PMCPMC12495131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.