ArticleHealth promotion practice2026
Health System Strategies to Improve the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Systematic Review.
Article in Health promotion practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screen-and-treat: a sustainable solution for cervical cancer elimination in low and middle income countries.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Living with HIV in South Africa: Addressing Health Disparities Through Integrated Prevention Strategies.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the highest rate of cervical cancer incidence and mortality. Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is essential for identifying and treating pre-cancer and early-stage cancer. However, CCS rates throughout SSA are substantially low due to a multitude of health system barriers, including poor access to CCS services and limited skilled providers and or resources. The aim of this scoping systematic review was to identify evidence-based health system-level strategies addressing barriers to implementing CCS in SSA. A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed and EMBASE, published in English from January 2010 to March 2024. The article review process involved independent screening by three trained research team members using Covidence software. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The systematic search returned 4,682 articles, 42 of which were included in the final analysis. The included studies were conducted in 17 SSA countries. Most effective implementation strategies included offering women the option of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection, single-visit CCS and treatment, providing CCS services at nonclinical community settings, training nonclinical providers to deliver CCS via task-sharing, and integrating CCS into existing nonprimary care or gynecologic settings such as HIV screening clinics. We identified successful strategies to address health system barriers to CCS in SSA. Health care systems should consider implementing these strategies to maximize the outcome of reaching the World Health Organization's cervical cancer elimination goal of screening 70% of women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.