ArticleJournal of health psychology2026
Reasons for exercise inventory: A validation of the Dutch version in a community sample and a sample of women with an eating disorder.
Article in Journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reasons for exercise inventory (REI) is a self-report instrument to assess why people exercise. It is important to assess the reasons for exercise in people with an eating disorder (ED), who regularly suffer from compulsive exercise. In this study the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the REI and differences in scores are evaluated in an ED and a community sample consisting of women. Factor analysis revealed three factors: health, appearance/weight and mood. Reliability (internal consistency, test-retest) was good. The ED sample scored significantly lower on the Health subscale and significantly higher on the appereance/weight and mood subscales than the community sample exercising for appearance/weight showed a moderately positive correlation with EDE-Q scores in both samples. The Dutch version of the REI showed promising psychometric properties that support its value for clinical and research purposes. Using three subscales may enhance research and assessment of the reasons for exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.