ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2025
Transdermal Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Using a Biodegradable Microneedle Array Patch in a Murine Model of Peanut Anaphylaxis.
Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking asthma therapy, part 2: transdermal strategies for adjunct asthma and allergy treatments.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in Peanut Allergy: The Present and the Future.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePeanut anaphylaxis is a widespread challenge, particularly in children. We aimed to confirm the therapeutic effects of transdermal immunotherapy (TDIT) in a murine model of peanut anaphylaxis.
methodsWe developed a biodegradable microneedle array patch (MAP) by incorporating peanut extract (PE) with hyaluronic acid. The allergenicity of the PE in MAP was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition. The peanut anaphylaxis model was made with BALB/c or C3H/Hej mouse strains. We measured anaphylaxis clinical scores, as well as the levels of mouse mast cell protease-1 (MCPT-1), PE-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), specific immunoglobulin G (sIgG)1, and sIgG2a in serum. T cell populations in the spleen and jejunum were examined using immunohistochemical stains with confocal microscopy. Histological analysis of the jejunum was performed. The production of T helper cell type 2 (Th2) and regulatory T cell (Treg) cytokines by stimulated splenocytes were also measured.
resultsThe inhibitory capacity of the PE in MAP for PE sIgE was comparable to that of native PE. TDIT with 10 μg of PE-MAP recovered anaphylaxis score, sIgE, and the MCPT-1 levels, and enhanced sIgG1 and sIgG4 in serum. TDIT also reduced the recruitment of Th2 cells while increasing Treg and Th1 cells in both the spleen and jejunum. However, the efficacy of applying 10 μg of PE-MAP TDIT twice a week was more pronounced than applying once a week. Additionally, TDIT led to reduced production of Th2 cytokines (interleukin [IL]-4, IL-5, IL-13) and increased production of transforming growth factor-β by stimulated splenocytes. TDIT attenuated inflammation, mast cell infiltration, and villous damage in the jejunum.
conclusionsPE-MAP TDIT demonstrated therapeutic effects in peanut anaphylaxis, suggesting its potential for developing a novel TDIT for patients with peanut anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.