ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2025
Characterizing Systemic Reactions During Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for House Dust Mite Allergies in China: Insights From a Cluster Analysis Study.
Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSubcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) can trigger systemic reactions (SRs) that pose potential life-threatening risks. To date, no cluster analysis has been conducted to delineate sub-phenotypes of SRs. This study aims to identify and characterize diverse SR phenotypes during SCIT for house dust mite (HDM) allergies in China.
methodsThis large retrospective real-world study enrolled patients diagnosed with HDM-sensitized allergic rhinitis (AR) and/or asthma who underwent SCIT (Alutard SQ; ALK) between February 2013 and July 2024 at five allergy centers in China. Data on demographic profiles and SRs were collected, followed by a cluster analysis among SR patients.
resultsA total of 3,126 patients received 107,588 injections, with SRs observed in 354 patients (11.32%) and 1,056 injections (0.98%). A higher incidence of SRs was noted in younger patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.92;
conclusionsAsthma, disease duration, high sensitization, and polysensitization emerge as independent risk factors for SRs. Our cluster analysis delineates distinct clinical phenotypes of SRs, offering tailored interventions for the personalized management of patients experiencing SRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.