ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus in metastatic cancer patients.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune checkpoint blockade targets macrophage PD-1 to exacerbate metabolic dysfunction.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess the risk of new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in metastatic cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to those receiving non-ICI therapies.
methodA retrospective cohort study using TriNetX global electronic health records (2014-2025) from multiple healthcare systems. Adult metastatic cancer patients initiating ICI or non-ICI therapy were included. Patients with preexisting diabetes within 6 months were excluded. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 25,463 patients remained in each group. Outcomes were identified by ICD-10 codes.
resultsMedian follow-up was 764 days (ICI) vs. 692 days (non-ICI). ICI use was associated with a higher risk of T1DM (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.81-3.04) and DKA (HR, 10.58; 95% CI, 4.21-26.59). Cumulative incidence analyses supported these findings, with ICIs showing higher risks of T1DM (0.75% vs. 0.32%; RR, 2.32 [95% CI, 1.79-3.00]) and DKA (0.20% vs. 0.04%; RR, 5.00 [95% CI, 2.54-9.86]). Subgroup analyses identified elevated baseline HbA1c (> 6.0%), male sex, white race, and dual checkpoint blockade as high-risk factors.
conclusionICIs significantly increase the risk of T1DM and DKA. These findings highlight the need for vigilant glycemic monitoring in cancer patients treated with ICIs, especially within identified high-risk subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.