Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044776›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2025

Integrating implementation science and intervention optimization.

Kate Guastaferro, Corrina Moucheraud, Jonathan Purtle, Linda M Collins, Donna Shelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate GuastaferroSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, Room 636, New York, NY, 10003, USA. Kate.guastaferro@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-9708
Corrina MoucheraudSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, Room 636, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Jonathan PurtleSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, Room 636, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Linda M CollinsSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, Room 636, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Donna ShelleySchool of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, Room 636, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation scientists increasingly recognize the value of multiple strategies to improve the adoption, fidelity, and scale up of an evidence-based intervention (EBI). However, with this recognition comes the need for alternative and innovative methods to ensure that the package of implementation strategies work well within constraints imposed by the need for affordability, scalability, and/or efficiency. The aim of this article is to illustrate that this can be accomplished by integrating principles of intervention optimization into implementation science.

methodWe use a hypothetical example to illustrate the application of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to develop and optimize a package of implementation strategies designed to improve clinic-level adoption of an EBI for smoking cessation.

resultsWe describe the steps an investigative team would take using MOST for an implementation science study. For each of the three phases of MOST (preparation, optimization, and evaluation), we describe the selection, optimization, and evaluation of four candidate implementation strategies (e.g., training, treatment guide, workflow redesign, and supervision). We provide practical considerations and discuss key methodological points.

conclusionOur intention in this methodological article is to inspire implementation scientists to integrate principles of intervention optimization in their studies, and to encourage the continued advancement of this integration.

Indexed as

Implementation ScienceSmoking CessationHumansFactorial experimentIntervention optimizationMultiphase optimization strategy (MOST)

Identifiers

PMID41044776
PMCPMC12495652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.