Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044772›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Evaluation of educational services quality and its impact on students' satisfaction and loyalty based on academic quality improvement program (AQIP) model.

Mohammad Amiri, Erfan Shahir-Roudi, Hajar Shahsavar, Ahmad Khosravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad AmiriDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-8530
Erfan Shahir-RoudiStudent Research Committee, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-9178
Hajar ShahsavarSchool of Public Health, MSc of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-5177
Ahmad KhosraviCenter for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran. khosravi2000us@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-3782

Funding

Shahroud University of Medical Sciences 1402005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTo ensure sustainable growth, higher education institutions must enhance educational service quality, student satisfaction, and loyalty. In this regard, the present study seeks to evaluate the relationship between educational services quality, students' satisfaction and loyalty at Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (northeast of Iran) in 2023. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a cross-sectional study, consisting of 316 medical students which were selected by multi-stage random sampling method. Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP), Students' academic satisfaction and Students' Loyalty questionnaires were used. The relationship between the latent and observer variables were analyzed using the structural equation method (SEM).

resultsMajority of students, 229 (72.5%) were female. While the mean score for evaluation of educational services quality was 63.4 ± 14.8, the mean scores for satisfaction with educational services and loyalty to the institution were 29.0 ± 6.6 and 29.2 ± 4 respectively. A significant and direct relationship was observed between the educational services quality score and the satisfaction score (standardized Beta coefficient = 0.83). Our findings revealed no direct association between educational services quality and student loyalty. However, this relationship is mediated by student satisfaction (standardized Beta coefficient = 0.94).

conclusionGiven the impact of educational service quality on student satisfaction and loyalty, we recommend targeted initiatives to: enhance faculty expertise, meet student needs (educational and services), improve facilities, foster respectful interactions, increase faculty-student engagement, enhance flexibility of curricula, offer academic advising, elevate teaching quality, and upgrade learning spaces and dormitories. We recommend focusing on both weaknesses and strengths, and repeatedly measuring service quality to ensure continuous improvement.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduatePersonal SatisfactionQuality ImprovementStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcademic quality improvement programEducational service qualityLoyaltyMedical studentsSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41044772
PMCPMC12495672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.