ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A scoping review of models of care and services for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Australian MotherSafe enhanced service for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum: a mixed methods study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Symptom Severity and Quality of Life Impact in Hyperemesis Gravidarum and Nausea of Pregnancy: Evidence From a Large Cross-Sectional Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum have significant physical and psychological impacts on pregnant women. Women are often unable to participate in everyday care and work activities, potentially affecting individual wellbeing and ability to contribute to the economy. Research priorities for hyperemesis gravidarum have been established, however little is known about the current landscape of literature on the health and social care provided to affected women. To inform decision makers on effective models of care and identify remaining evidence gaps, this scoping review aimed to map existing literature that evaluated health and social care delivery arrangements for pregnant women with nausea and vomiting and hyperemesis gravidarum.
methodsSeven databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Maternity and Infant Care, Cochrane Library and Scopus) were searched in August 2023 and again in March 2024 to identify evaluations of health care delivery arrangements for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. Database searches were supplemented by a Google search for additional peer-reviewed and grey literature. Data from included publications were extracted and synthesised to report on models of care identified, countries, study designs, outcome measures and key findings.
resultsSeventy-two records describing 60 separate models of care were identified. Models of care were grouped into hospital settings (n = 34 records), digital health (n = 19 records), group-based care (n = 11 records), and primary care (n = 8 records). Literature in the hospital setting addressed outpatient management (n = 15 records), inpatient management (n = 5 records), comparisons of outpatient and inpatient management (n = 10 records), in-home care (n = 3 records) and emergency departments (n = 1 record). Digital health care evaluations included telephone and web-based support (n = 14 records) and mobile phone applications (n = 5 records).
conclusionsThis scoping review has identified the need for further research on approaches to care provision for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum. Whilst some positive findings on patient outcomes, patient experiences and reduced hospital stays resulting from outpatient hospital management pathways were reported, much of this research was observational and limited to UK settings. Other research gaps identified pertained to the effectiveness of primary care, social support and in-home care services, including economic evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.