ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Light grazing enhances microbial-mediated nitrogen transformation in desert steppe soils.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Different grazing intensities affect soil nitrogen cycling by altering microbial nitrogen metabolism in alpine wetlands.iScience · 2026Article
- Responses of Soil Nitrogen-Cycling Microbial Communities and Functional Potential to Grazing Intensities in Alpine Meadows.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Effects of grazing intensity on plant community fungal diseases in an alpine grassland.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Nitrogen addition has negative effects on bacterial diversity and stability, but simulated grazing mitigates these effects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Grazing intensity drives above-belowground productivity trade-offs and reveals belowground dominance in temperate herbaceous marsh wetlands.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSoil microorganisms play a central role in nitrogen transformation and availability, yet their regulatory functions in mediating nitrogen transfer between soil and plants under long-term grazing remain poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate how grazing intensity influences soil microbial communities and nitrogen-cycling functional genes, and how these microbial shifts affect nitrogen transformation processes and plant nitrogen uptake in desert steppe ecosystems.
methodsHere, we present a comprehensive study on soil microbes and nitrogen cycling functions in a desert grassland subjected to four grazing intensities - no grazing, light (0.91 sheep/ha), moderate (1.82 sheep/ha), and heavy (2.71 sheep/ha) - over 17 years.
resultsWe found that both the structural composition and the function of soil microbial communities varied across grazing intensities, with more pronounced changes in rhizosphere soil than in bulk soil. The relative abundance of nitrogen-cycling functional genes was generally higher under no grazing or light grazing conditions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that increases in soil pH under long-term grazing were significantly associated with shifts in microbial communities and with reduced net nitrogen mineralization rates. These changes were further linked to decreased soil nitrogen availability and lower nitrogen content in plant tissues.
conclusionsLight grazing in desert steppe ecosystems partially maintains microbial nitrogen cycling potential by supporting the abundance of nitrogen functional genes and preserving microbial community structure, despite an overall decline in nitrogen mineralization under grazing. These results suggest that low-intensity grazing may help mitigate grazing-induced suppression of nitrogen availability and plant uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.