Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044759›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2025

Differences in respiratory wheezing between current exclusive e-cigarette users, current exclusive cigarette smokers, and never users of either product: findings from a population-based study.

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Najim Z Alshahrani, Lucia Spicuzza, Francesco Pennisi, Giulio Geraci, Giulio Giacono Cantone, Venera Tomaselli, Riccardo Polosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yusuff Adebayo AdebisiCollege of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, 40 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RT, UK. y.adebisi.1@research.gla.ac.uk.
Najim Z AlshahraniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Lucia SpicuzzaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco PennisiDepartment of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Giulio GeraciFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, "Kore" University of Enna, Enna, Italy.
Giulio Giacono Cantone"Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Venera TomaselliCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Riccardo PolosaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-cigarettes have emerged as an alternative to combustible cigarettes, yet their comparative impact on respiratory symptoms remains uncertain. We investigated cross-sectional differences in self-reported wheezing between current exclusive e-cigarette users, current exclusive cigarette smokers, and never-users of either product.

methodsWe analysed data from 9000 adults aged ≥ 16 years in the 2017-2019 Scottish Health Survey. The exposure was current nicotine use status (exclusive cigarette smoking, exclusive e-cigarette use, or never-use), and the outcome was self-reported wheezing in the past 12 months. Binary multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for age, sex, area-level socioeconomic deprivation, longstanding illness, doctor-diagnosed asthma and COPD, self-rated general health, alcohol consumption, age of smoking initiation, and exposure to second-hand smoke.

resultsCompared to exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers had significantly higher odds of wheezing (adjusted OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.33-2.42, p < 0.001). Never-users had lower odds of wheezing than exclusive e-cigarette users, though the difference was not significant (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.31-1.40, p = 0.275). Among exclusive cigarette smokers, the odds of wheezing increased with smoking intensity relative to exclusive e-cigarette users, indicating a dose-response relationship (χ² = 5.91, p = 0.018). Specifically, light smokers (< 10 cigarettes/day) had elevated but not significant odds (adjusted OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.92-1.89, p = 0.133), while moderate smokers (10-19 cigarettes/day) showed higher odds (adjusted OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.33-2.59, p < 0.001), and heavy smokers (≥ 20 cigarettes/day) had the greatest odds (adjusted OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.57-3.28, p < 0.001). Adjusted predicted probabilities of wheezing mirrored this pattern: compared with exclusive e-cigarette users, probabilities were significantly higher for moderate smokers (+ 7.2%, p = 0.002) and heavy smokers (+ 10.0%, p < 0.001), but not for light smokers (+ 3.0%, p = 0.152) or never-users (-3.9%, p = 0.306).

conclusionsExclusive e-cigarette use was not associated with higher odds of wheezing compared with never-use, and it was linked to substantially lower odds than exclusive cigarette smoking. These findings suggest that, while complete abstinence remains the lowest-risk option, e-cigarette use may pose fewer respiratory symptoms than smoking, particularly for moderate-to-heavy smokers.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsRespiratory SoundsSmokersVapingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedScotlandSelf ReportExclusive cigarette smokingExclusive e-cigarette useRespiratory symptomsWheezing

Identifiers

PMID41044759
PMCPMC12495708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.