Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044732›Full record

ReviewKorean circulation journal2025

Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Ju Hyeon Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Kyeong-Won Seo, Seung Han Lee, Seong-Bong Wee, Soo Yeon An, Hansu Park, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean circulation journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ju Hyeon KimDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-0891
Do-Yoon KangDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-0562
Jung-Min AhnDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-391X
Kyeong-Won SeoDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7307-0830
Seung Han LeeDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6849-1658
Seong-Bong WeeDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5779-5266
Soo Yeon AnDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4313-1700
Hansu ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-8383
Duk-Woo ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dwpark@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6643-0239
Seung-Jung ParkDivision of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9187-5405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coexistence of severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) presents complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands to younger, lower-risk populations. CAD prevalence in AS patients ranges from 27.7% in low-risk cohorts to 74.9% in high-risk populations, synergistically worsening ventricular function and prognosis. Diagnostic evaluation remains challenging due to overlapping symptomatology and altered coronary physiology in severe AS. While invasive coronary angiography remains the gold standard, coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography with CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) shows promise as a non-invasive alternative. Standard FFR thresholds may not be reliable in AS patients, with emerging evidence suggesting AS-specific cutoffs may be needed. Treatment strategies must balance the complexity of CAD with patient risk profiles. Current guidelines recommend bypass surgery with surgical aortic valve replacement for complex multivessel disease, while percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with TAVR is preferred for less complex lesions or high-risk patients. The optimal timing of PCI relative to TAVR remains debated, with recent data favoring a "TAVR-first" approach for non-critical lesions. As TAVR extends to younger patients, lifetime management considerations become paramount, including valve durability, future coronary access, and planning for potential re-interventions. Commissural alignment techniques during TAVR are crucial for preserving future coronary access. A multidisciplinary Heart Team approach with robust shared decision-making is essential for optimizing individualized care in this evolving field.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisCoronary artery diseaseTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID41044732
PMCPMC12705249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.