ArticleBMC surgery2025
Detecting pancreaticobiliary maljunction in pediatric congenital choledochal malformation patients using machine learning methods.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures for Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction: A Narrative Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Surgical management strategies and postoperative outcomes of choledochal cysts in children: the role of preoperative radiological assessment in a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe presence of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) in pediatric patients with congenital choledochal malformation significantly impacts clinical management and surgical decision-making. Current preoperative evaluation of PBM coexistence remains challenging in children, while intraoperative cholangiography does not consistently provide diagnostic-quality imaging. This study aims to develop machine learning-based algorithm models for detecting pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) in children with congenital choledochal malformation.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study utilizing data from patients with congenital choledochal malformation treated at our center between January 2019 and January 2024. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, and preoperative laboratory parameters were processed through rigorous data curation and feature engineering pipelines. Cases were allocated via random sampling into training (80%) and hold-out test (20%) cohorts, maintaining strict separation between training and test cohorts. Seven machine learning algorithms - Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) - were implemented with five-fold cross-validation. An ensemble voting classifier was specifically constructed using these models. Model performance was quantified through comprehensive metrics including area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. This study employed the nonparametric bootstrap method to estimate the confidence interval for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed for model interpretability, with feature importance rankings determined by absolute SHAP value magnitudes.
resultsIn a cohort of 803 pediatric patients with congenital choledochal malformation, 628 (78.2%) demonstrated concurrent pancreaticobiliary maljunction. We developed a detection model incorporating 43 clinical features, with Random Forest showing optimal performance. An ensemble voting classifier integrating seven machine learning algorithms achieved enhanced discriminative performance (AUC: 0.87 (0.81, 0.92); Recall: 0.91 (0.85, 0.95); F1-score: 0.91 (0.87, 0.94)). Key features contributing to PBM detection included: laboratory markers and clinical parameters.
conclusionBy integrating preoperative clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters, machine learning algorithms demonstrated significant detection capability in identifying PBM among pediatric congenital choledochal malformation patients, with the RF model achieving superior performance metrics among all base models. The developed ensemble voting classifier provides valuable preoperative guidance for surgical planning and clinical management, enabling detection of PBM comorbidity before surgery in congenital choledochal malformation cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.