Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044709›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2025

Surgeon well-being: a systematic review of stressors, mental health, and resilience.

Eniola Z Otukoya, Akram Amiri, Ehsan Alimohammadi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eniola Z OtukoyaTouro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Harlem, NY, USA.
Akram AmiriAkram Amiri, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Ehsan AlimohammadiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. hafez125@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgeons work in high-pressure environments, predisposing them to psychological distress. High rates of burnout and workforce shortages highlight the critical importance of understanding and improving surgeon well-being to sustain healthcare delivery. The multifactorial challenges to surgeon well-being remain insufficiently addressed. This study systematically synthesizes evidence on occupational stressors, burnout, mental health challenges, and resilience strategies among surgeons, and identifies evidence-based interventions to enhance well-being and workforce sustainability.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (2000-2025) identified peer-reviewed studies on surgeon well-being, burnout, mental health, and resilience. Editorials and non-empirical studies were excluded. Sixty-six studies were included following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework screening. A narrative synthesis identified thematic domains and intervention outcomes. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of burnout, anxiety, and depression among surgeons, sources of occupational stress, and descriptions of interventions promoting resilience or institutional wellness.

resultsThe literature search identified 534 records through database searching, and an additional 22 records from other sources. After removing duplicates, 356 records remained. 253 records were excluded after initial screening. 103 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 27 were excluded, leaving 76 studies for qualitative synthesis. Surgeons experience high levels of burnout (30-60%) and elevated risks of anxiety, depression, and attrition. Key stressors include long work hours, high patient responsibility, and insufficient institutional support. Individual-level strategies (e.g., mindfulness, physical activity, peer support) offer some benefit but are insufficient alone. Organizational interventions-such as flexible scheduling, resilience training, and embedded mental health services-show promise but are inconsistently implemented. Stigma and licensing concerns remain systemic barriers to seeking help.

conclusionsSurgeon well-being is crucial for both provider and patient outcomes. Addressing this requires coordinated efforts at the individual, institutional, and policy levels. Prioritizing surgeon well-being is essential for safeguarding the surgical workforce and ensuring quality patient care in modern healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalMental HealthOccupational StressResilience, PsychologicalSurgeonsHumansBurnoutInstitutional wellnessOccupational stressorsSurgeonsWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41044709
PMCPMC12495620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.