ArticleBMC cancer2025
Expression and prognostic value of MCM2 in type B thymomas.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are the most common mediastinal malignancies, lacking reliable prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to identify a potential prognostic marker for TETs.
methodsmRNA microarray analysis of 30 tumor and peritumoral tissues identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Hub genes were selected via protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis, with MCM2 chosen as the target gene. Survival and enrichment analyses were performed, and a validation cohort assessed MCM2's association with prognosis and clinicopathological features.
resultsSeven hundred thirty-four DEGs were identified, with MCM2 significantly associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.54; p = 0.003) and identified as an independent risk factor for PFS (HR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.91; p = 0.035). MCM2 expression decreased from type B1 to B3 thymomas.
conclusionsMCM2 is an independent prognostic factor for TETs, with higher expression linked to better PFS and decreasing expression across B-type thymomas, suggesting its role as a favorable prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.