SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue toxicity injury after head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The feasibility and toxicity of the second course of boron neutron capture therapy in recurrent head and neck cancer patients.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Chronic Radiation-Induced Wounds: Pathogenesis, Current Therapeutic Strategies, and Emerging Regenerative Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microenvironment-responsive injectable dynamic hydrogel for sequential antioxidant and tissue regeneration therapy of radiation-induced skin injury.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques for structural and functional assessment of salivary glands.Radiology and oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHead and neck cancer (HNC), most of which are squamous cell carcinomas, is the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Radiotherapy is a standard treatment for HNC but may lead to late complications and severe complications like osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and impaired wound healing due to tissue hypoxia. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has shown promise in ameliorating these late radiation effects. The purpose of this review is to summarize the extent of the literature on the effectiveness of HBOT in the treatment of late radiation tissue toxicity injuries (LRTTI) specifically in HNC patients. METHODS/MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on August 12, 2024, including studies published between 2004 and 2022. Studies that included HNC patients with LRTTI and treated with HBOT were selected. Articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Data on patient characteristics, HBOT treatment details, and main outcomes were extracted. Primary outcomes assessed included clinical changes, such as the Notani score, while secondary outcomes focused on patient-reported measures such as VAS and OHIP. Descriptive analysis, supported by statistical measures, was used to interpret the results.
resultsA total of 17 studies were reviewed, including 640 HNC patients with LRTTI who were treated with HBOT. In this systematic review, HBOT is presented in the included studies as a reliable and safe treatment for the treatment of LRTTI in HNC patients, with positive outcomes observed in 14 out of 17 studies. Specifically, almost all studies investigating ORN and oral health reported beneficial effects, with significant p-values in multiple cases. Overall, significant p-values were found in 11 studies, with a low incidence of adverse effects reported across the studies.
conclusionThis review suggests that HBOT may be effective in the treatment of LRTTI in HNC patients. However, the supporting evidence is mainly derived from low quality studies with a high risk of bias, limited sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures. Additional high quality studies are needed to clarify the true clinical benefits and optimal use of HBOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.