Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044640›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Cross-sectional survey of risk factors for edema disease Escherichia coli (EDEC) on commercial pig farms in Germany.

Pia I Berger, Steffen Hermanns, Friederike Schmelz, Katharina Kerner, Daniel Sperling, Christa Ewers, Rolf Bauerfeind, Marcus G Doherr

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pia I BergerInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. pia.kersten@fu-berlin.de.
Steffen HermannsInstitute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Friederike SchmelzIDT Biologika GmbH, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
Katharina KernerInstitute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Daniel SperlingCeva Santé Animale, Libourne, France.
Christa EwersInstitute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Rolf BauerfeindInstitute for Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Marcus G DoherrInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEdema disease (ED) in swine, usually caused by certain Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (EDEC) in the first few weeks after weaning, has a high mortality rate in affected piglets and can lead to high economic losses in rearing. In the published first part of the study, we found EDEC in 37.4% of all investigated farms keeping weaned piglets in Germany [1]. In this part of the project, we analyzed risk factors for the presence of EDEC on those farms by using an interview-based questionnaire.

resultsDuring the interview, data on farm structure and performance, health status of weaned piglets, farm management as well as feeding and water supply were collected from the farm managers. Univariable analyses using either cross tabulation and a 2-sided Fisher´s exact test (FET) or a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) identified factors potentially associated with farm-level EDEC presence. Multivariable logistic regression models (outcome: farm positive for EDEC) as well as negative binomial regression models (outcome: number of pens per farm positive for EDEC) were used to identify final risk factors. Higher age of piglets at the beginning of pre-starter feeding (in the farrowing area) increased the EDEC risk. Significantly, the risk increased for those farms that did not provide a pre-starter to the piglets until after day ten of life (odds ratio 4.64; p-value 0.015). The use of certain vaccines (STEC, Lawsonia intracellularis and Clostridium spp.) also yielded significant results. Farms with higher weaning weights and higher weights at the end of the flat deck period had a higher risk of EDEC presence, whereas the results in relation to weaning age were inconclusive.

conclusionsMany variables that are considered risk factors for ED have already been excluded due to lack of significance after univariable analysis. Nevertheless, early feeding of a pre-starter in the farrowing area seems to reduce the risk of detecting EDEC in weaned piglets, as well as it seems beneficial for farms to vaccinate sows against Clostridium spp. Our study also showed a higher risk of EDEC detection for farms with superior performance/ high piglet weights. The influence of the weaning age may be the subject of further investigations.

Indexed as

Edema Disease of SwineEscherichia coli InfectionsShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliSwine DiseasesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFarmsFemaleGermanyRisk FactorsSwineWeaningEDECEdema diseaseEscherichia coliGLMLogistic regressionPigsStx2e

Identifiers

PMID41044640
PMCPMC12492929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.