ArticleGenome biology2025
Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking biomedical foundation models.Nature methods · 2026Review
- A systematic assessment of single-cell language model configurations.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Annotation-free phenotype prediction using knowledge-augmented clustering from single-cell RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Diffusion-based representation integration for foundation models improves spatial transcriptomics analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the learnability of single-cell large language models on multiple tasks.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- scHILL: deciphering individual-level immune cell heterogeneity with single-cell RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A transcriptomics-native foundation model for universal cell representation and virtual cell synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- Diffusion-based Representation Integration for Foundation Models Improves Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A unified framework enables accessible deployment and comprehensive benchmarking of single-cell foundation models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deciphering immune-inflammatory dysregulation in the endometriotic microenvironment: insights from single-cell omics and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- AI-integrated single-cell multi-omics decodes the hepatocellular carcinoma metabolism-immune axis: a new strategy for precision therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Toward trustworthy virtual cells: a roadmap for perturbation-resolved, context-aware, and experimentally validated cell models.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Biology-driven insights into the power of single-cell foundation models.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Epigenetic control of antigen presentation failure in osteosarcoma: from single-cell chromatin maps to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell foundation models (scFMs) have emerged as powerful tools for integrating heterogeneous datasets and exploring biological systems. Despite high expectations, their ability to extract unique biological insights beyond standard methods and their advantages over traditional approaches in specific tasks remain unclear.
resultsHere, we present a comprehensive benchmark study of six scFMs against well-established baselines under realistic conditions, encompassing two gene-level and four cell-level tasks. Pre-clinical batch integration and cell type annotation are evaluated across five datasets with diverse biological conditions, while clinically relevant tasks, such as cancer cell identification and drug sensitivity prediction, are assessed across seven cancer types and four drugs. Model performance is evaluated using 12 metrics spanning unsupervised, supervised, and knowledge-based approaches, including scGraph-OntoRWR, a novel metric designed to uncover intrinsic knowledge encoded by scFMs. We provide holistic rankings from dataset-specific to general performance to guide model selection. Our findings reveal that scFMs are robust and versatile tools for diverse applications while simpler machine learning models are more adept at efficiently adapting to specific datasets, particularly under resource constraints. Notably, no single scFM consistently outperforms others across all tasks, emphasizing the need for tailored model selection based on factors such as dataset size, task complexity, biological interpretability, and computational resources.
conclusionsThis benchmark introduces novel evaluation perspectives, identifying the strengths and limitations of current scFMs, and paves the way for their effective application in biological and clinical research, including cell atlas construction, tumor microenvironment studies, and treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.