ArticleBMC surgery2025
Risk factors and predictive modeling of intraoperative hypothermia in laparoscopic surgery patients.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk prediction models for inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Prevalence and risk factors associated with inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing trauma surgery: a single-center retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors for perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing spinal trauma surgery.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Hypothermia and recovery outcomes before and after implementation of a multimodal perioperative temperature-management bundle in minimally invasive radical rectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInadvertent intra-operative hypothermia (< 36 °C) is frequent during laparoscopic surgery and worsens postoperative outcomes. Reliable risk-prediction tools for this setting are still lacking.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed 207 adults who underwent laparoscopic procedures at a single hospital (June 2021 – June 2024). Core temperature was recorded nasopharyngeally every 15 min. Hypothermia was defined as any intra-operative value < 36 °C. Univariable tests and multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors; coefficients were converted into a weighted risk score. Model discrimination (AUC) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, calibration plot) were assessed with 1 000-bootstrap internal validation.
resultsHypothermia occurred in 110 patients (53%). Five variables remained independently associated with risk: body-mass index ≤ 23 kg m⁻², baseline core temperature ≤ 36.1 °C, operating-room temperature ≤ 22 °C, surgical duration ≥ 120 min, and pre-operative systolic blood pressure > 130 mmHg (all P < 0.05). The resulting five-item score (0–12 points) showed good discrimination (optimism-corrected AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.74–0.87) and adequate calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow P = 0.10; Brier = 0.18). A cut-off ≥ 3 points identified high-risk patients with 68% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
conclusionsLow BMI, low baseline temperature, cool theatre environment, prolonged surgery and hypertension jointly heighten hypothermia risk during laparoscopy. The simple five-item score enables rapid pre-operative stratification and may guide targeted warming strategies. External multicentre validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.