ArticleBMC oral health2025
Plasma cytokine profiles in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Running out the clock: Circadian rhythm dysfunction in cognitive disease.International review of neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHead and neck cancers, including oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), impact significant global health challenges. This study aimed to evaluate plasma cytokine profiles in patients with oral and oropharyngeal SCC compared to healthy donors to explore potential diagnostic biomarkers.
methodsPlasma samples from 18 healthy donors, 11 oral cancer patients, and 11 oropharyngeal cancer patients were analysed using LEGENDplex™ multiplex assays to quantify 49 cytokines and inflammatory proteins. Statistical analysis, including Mann-Whitney U test and ROC curve analysis, was performed to assess diagnostic utility.
resultssFasL levels were significantly downregulated in cancer patients, whereas PECAM-1, FGF-basic, EPO, PDGF-AA, and PDGF-BB levels were upregulated. Combined analysis of PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB achieved a sensitivity of 98.38% and specificity of 73.87% for oral cancer diagnosis. PECAM-1 demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting oropharyngeal cancer.
conclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that alterations in plasma levels of sFasL, PECAM-1, FGF-basic, EPO, PDGF-AA, and PDGF-BB suggest their potential as early diagnostic markers for oral and oropharyngeal SCC. Larger cohort studies are warranted to validate these findings and to develop screening strategies for head and neck cancers.
trial registrationThe study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (IRB 810/62, Bangkok, Thailand) and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.