Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044556›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

The construction of an evaluation index system for the health vulnerability of frail and vulnerable older persons in nursing homes: a Delphi study.

Xiaochu Liu, Li Gu, Li Zou, Xu Mei, Zhenhuan Yang, Mei Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaochu LiuCardiovascular Department, Luzhou People's Hospital, 316 Jiugu Street, Luzhou, China. 409635667@qq.com.
Li GuSchool of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou, China.
Li ZouNursing Department, Luzhou People's Hospital, 316 Jiugu Street, Luzhou, China.
Xu MeiCardiovascular Department, Luzhou People's Hospital, 316 Jiugu Street, Luzhou, China.
Zhenhuan YangCardiovascular Department, Luzhou People's Hospital, 316 Jiugu Street, Luzhou, China.
Mei JuSchool of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, 1 Xianglin Road, Luzhou, China.

Funding

Luzhou Science and Technology Program 2023RQN187Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2022099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the physiological decline in late life, coupled with an elevated risk of various diseases and anticipated adverse events, frail and vulnerable older persons in nursing homes are a principal group that is vulnerable to health risks, thereby manifesting a triple vulnerability comprising "physical-mental-economic" aspects. However, standardized assessments of health vulnerability in frail and vulnerable older persons within nursing homes in China are currently lacking, and an evaluation index system has not yet been undeveloped. Therefore, the aim of this study was to construct an index system for comprehensively evaluating the health vulnerability of frail and vulnerable older persons in nursing homes, aiming to offer personalized elderly care services as a reference for predicting health vulnerability risks among this demographic population.

methodsOn the basis of the "sensitivity‒response capacity" vulnerability analysis framework, multidimensional risk indicators for health vulnerability were preliminarily established through policy literature analysis and semistructured interviews. Between April and August 2023, a Delphi study involved 20 expert representatives from four provinces and municipalities, spanning multiple research domains, for participation. Using a five-point Likert scale, they assessed the value of predefined indicators and provided qualitative feedback. Subsequent to each round of expert input, revisions were enacted upon the evaluation index system.

resultsAfter three rounds of expert consultation, a consensus on the evaluation index system was reached; it contains two primary indicators, individual sensitivity and antifragility capacity, with 12 affiliated secondary indicators and 56 tertiary indicators. The expert authority coefficients ranged from 0.934 to 0.935, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance ranged from 0.310 to 0.360. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe evaluation index system for assessing the health vulnerability of frail and vulnerable older persons in nursing homes developed in this study covers a range of health threats and indicators of health coping capacity faced by frail and vulnerable older persons from individual to societal perspectives. This evaluation index system employs the "sensitivity‒responsiveness" vulnerability analysis framework, addressing the limitations of single-dimensional assessment indicators in capturing a comprehensive overview. This study provides a novel research perspective for assessing health vulnerability in frail and vulnerable older persons. This evaluation index system provides a practical tool for nursing home staff to assess health vulnerability, enabling early risk identification and targeted interventions. Policy-makers and administrators can use it to optimize resource allocation and enhance elderly care services. Future research should validate its real-world applicability and integrate it into existing health monitoring and intervention programs to improve older persons' health outcomes.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentNursing HomesVulnerable PopulationsAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentAnalytic hierarchy process (AHP)Delphi methodFrail and vulnerable older personsHealth vulnerabilityIndex system construction

Identifiers

PMID41044556
PMCPMC12495867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.