Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044548›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

A comparison of efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous applications of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Pengrui Feng, Li Feng, Zhencheng Xiong, Chaoyi Zhang, Guanglin Wang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intravenous versus oral tranexamic acid in shoulder arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengrui FengDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li FengDepartment of obstetrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhencheng XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chaoyi ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guanglin WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. wglfrank@wchscu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranexamic acid (TXA) has been extensively used in total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) to reduce blood loss. The commonly investigated routes of TXA administration include oral, intravenous, intra-articular, and topical methods. However, the ideal route of administration remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total knee and hip arthroplasty.

methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which updated on October 2024. Decline of hemoglobin (DHB), total blood loss (TBL), length of hospital stays (HS), intra-operative blood loss (IBL), operative time, transfusion rate, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and intramuscular venous thrombosis (IVT) were extracted and analyzed. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each outcome based on the degree of heterogeneity. Furthermore, we assessed publication bias through funnel plots, Egger tests and the trim-and-fill method. The study adhered to PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. All of the analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software.

resultsA total of 2,262 patients from 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of decline of hemoglobin (P = 0.95), total blood loss(P = 0.59), length of hospital stays (P = 0.28), intra-operative blood loss (P = 0.64), operative time (P = 0.67), transfusion rate (P = 0.96), deep vein thrombosis (P = 0.14), intramuscular venous thrombosis (P = 0.14) between the oral and intravenous groups. But five studies reported that oral TXA has lower cost than intravenous.

conclusionThis meta-analysis provided updated evidence that suggests oral and intravenous TXA have similar efficacy and safety. However, oral tranexamic acid can reduce financial burden of joint replacement on patients. So more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm that oral may be the ideal route of administration for TXA.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBlood Loss, SurgicalTranexamic AcidAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralBlood TransfusionHumansLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVenous ThrombosisAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic AcidIntravenousOralPrimary total hip/knee arthroplastyTranexamic acid

Identifiers

PMID41044548
PMCPMC12495616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.