ArticleCommunications biology2025
How SecB maintains clients in a translocation competent state.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the Bacterial Chaperones SecB and Trigger Factor (TF) on the Folding Dynamics and In Vitro Translocation of Cytoplasmic and Secretory Model Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- How SecB maintains clients in a translocation competent state.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial secretory proteins must remain soluble and non-folded until they reach the SecYEG translocase. Preprotein intrinsic features and chaperones can delay protein folding. The SecB chaperone is known to delay folding of some proteins, however the link between the folding state of a client and its interaction with SecB, until the client-transfer to the translocase remains elusive. This study unravels how a model client, maltose binding protein (MBP), is kept in a non-folded state by SecB. Using single-molecule FRET and hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, we describe in detail the folding pathway of the client and demonstrate that SecB acts first as an unfoldase, reverting partial folding and then as holdase, preventing folding. The presence of an SP delays the folding and stabilizes the client to SecB interaction. Single-point mutations that abolish formation of some foldons drastically increase the lifetime of the SecB-bound state. Towards delivery to the translocase, SecA interacts with the MBP:SecB complex forming a quaternary super-assembly thus, further stabilizing the disordered state of the client. Collectively, our study demonstrates the interplay between secretory chaperones and a model client, with SecB combining unfoldase and holdase activities to retain the client in a translocation-competent state while SecA secures this complex until later translocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.