Observational studyScientific reports2025
Evaluation of color perception in cataract patients bilateral implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluates postoperative color perception in cataract patients implanted with various yellow-tinted intraocular lenses (Y-IOL) and clear intraocular lenses (C-IOL), including extended depth of focus (EDOF) and trifocal lenses, using the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test. An observational clinical study was conducted on patients undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of either Y-IOL or C-IOL at Guangzhou Aier Eye Hospital. Patients were categorized into Y-IOL and C-IOL groups based on lens tint and further subcategorized by design (EDOF vs. trifocal, Y-trifocal vs. C-trifocal). The FM-100 Hue test assessed total error score root mean square (TES RMS), angle, C-Index, S-Index, and total test duration three months postoperatively. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Among 54 patients (108 eyes), no significant differences in TES, angle, C-Index, S-Index, or test duration were observed between Y-IOL and C-IOL groups or between EDOF and trifocal IOL groups (all P > 0.05). However, a significant difference in the S-Index was noted between the Y-trifocal and C-trifocal IOL subgroups (P < 0.05), indicating differing color axis scatter tendencies. The implantation of blue-light filtering IOLs does not significantly affect color perception when compared to clear IOLs. The design differences between presbyopia-correcting IOLs, such as extended depth of focus and trifocal IOLs, also had minimal impact on patients' postoperative color vision, except for a notable difference in scatter index between two trifocal IOLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.