ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Infection risk assessment for socially structured population using stochastic microexposure model.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting infection outbreak dynamics within local microenvironments is a challenging task. Some methods assume smaller population pools and often lack the statistical power of inferences. Other methods are designed for larger population pools and cannot be downscaled to accommodate the details of microenvironments, such as a gym or cafeteria. Moreover, typically, individuals have a relatively small circle of friends, family, and co-workers with whom most contacts are taking place, while the external contacts occur sporadically, rendering the population clustered. Practicable infection risk assessment models should account for population size, geometry and occupancy of public places, behavioral and professional patterns that define daily routines, and societal structure.
objectiveWe describe a novel methodology and investigate effects of the population social structure, along with other local constraints, on infection outbreak dynamics.
methodsThe study is based on the recently developed stochastic microexposure model (S-MEM). The model has been generalized to describe clustered populations. The methodology is demonstrated for a generic community of several thousand students living on campus. The student population possesses a natural social structure of being clustered into classes.
resultsThe results indicate that the social structure has the first order effect on the spread of the infection. Depending on the number, size, and degree of inner- and outer-cluster connections, the outbreak exhibits distinct durations, power, and multiple peaks of infection. Moreover, the contribution of different microenvironments to infection risk evolves during the course of the outbreak. IMPACT: Social structure plays a major role in infection spread, and therefore should be accounted for in risk prediction tools. Furthermore, the contribution of different microenvironments to infection risk changes with time during the course of an outbreak. An optimal infection spread mitigation policy should, correspondingly, change in time depending on the evolving risk factors; the policy should not be static. The stochastic microexposure model accounts for the social structure of a population at multiple scales, and can predict the dynamic contributions of different microenvironments to infection spread risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41044398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.