Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044359›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fast and robust mixed gas identification and recognition using tree-based machine learning and sensor array response.

Ghazala Ansari, Rupali Singh, Sachin Kumar, Naglaa F Soliman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghazala AnsariDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR Campus, Delhi-Meerut Road, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, 201204, Uttar Pradesh, India. ghazala.vlsi@gmail.com.
Rupali SinghDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR Campus, Delhi-Meerut Road, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, 201204, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sachin KumarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Naglaa F SolimanDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. nfsoliman@pnu.edu.sa.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia PNURSP2025R66
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of gas mixtures is critical in chemical engineering, food safety, environmental science, and medical applications. This study employs a four-sensor array to classify ethylene-methane and ethylene-carbon monoxide (CO) mixtures, with concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 ppm for ethylene, 0-600 ppm for CO, and 0-300 ppm for methane. To enhance robustness, mean sensor response over time is used to mitigate noise, ensuring high classification accuracy. Each sample is evaluated using sixteen features, including temporal dynamics (e.g., rise time) and statistical metrics (e.g., baseline variance). Tree-based machine learning models-Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET)-are developed for gas classification, significantly reducing training set size (to 60%) and prediction time. The proposed ET model achieves superior classification accuracy (99.15%) compared to RF (95.86%) and DT (93.89%) on the UCI dataset, offering an efficient and accurate method for experimental gas identification.

Identifiers

PMID41044359
PMCPMC12494756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.