ArticleScientific reports2025
Fast and robust mixed gas identification and recognition using tree-based machine learning and sensor array response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced hybrid 3DCNN-SGAN framework for high-precision gas mixture analysis with sensor arrays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of gas mixtures is critical in chemical engineering, food safety, environmental science, and medical applications. This study employs a four-sensor array to classify ethylene-methane and ethylene-carbon monoxide (CO) mixtures, with concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 ppm for ethylene, 0-600 ppm for CO, and 0-300 ppm for methane. To enhance robustness, mean sensor response over time is used to mitigate noise, ensuring high classification accuracy. Each sample is evaluated using sixteen features, including temporal dynamics (e.g., rise time) and statistical metrics (e.g., baseline variance). Tree-based machine learning models-Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET)-are developed for gas classification, significantly reducing training set size (to 60%) and prediction time. The proposed ET model achieves superior classification accuracy (99.15%) compared to RF (95.86%) and DT (93.89%) on the UCI dataset, offering an efficient and accurate method for experimental gas identification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.