ArticleScientific reports2025
Salt rock creep deformation forecasting using deep neural networks and analytical models for subsurface energy storage applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Creep Modeling and Influencing Factor Analysis of Ultradeep Salt Cavern Gas Storage.ACS omega · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides an in-depth analysis of time series forecasting methods to predict the time-dependent deformation trend (also known as creep) of salt rock under varying confining pressure conditions. Creep deformation assessment is essential for designing and operating underground storage facilities for nuclear waste, hydrogen energy, or radioactive materials. Salt rocks, known for their mechanical properties like low porosity, low permeability, high ductility, and exceptional creep and self-healing capacities, were examined using multi-stage triaxial creep data. After resampling, axial strain datasets were recorded at 5-10 sec intervals under confining pressure levels ranging from 5 to 35 MPa over 5.8-21 days. Initial analyses, including Seasonal-Trend Decomposition and Granger causality tests, revealed minimal seasonality and causality between axial strain and temperature data. Further statistical tests, such as the Automated Dickey-Fuller test, confirmed the stationarity of the data with p-values less than 0.05, and wavelet coherence plot analysis indicated repeating trends. A suite of deep neural network (DNN) models-Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Time Series (N-BEATS), Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), Recurrent Neural Networks, and Transformers-were utilized and compared against statistical baseline models. Predictive performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE in %), and Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE in %). Results demonstrated that N-BEATS and TCN models outperformed others, with RMSE values of(0.3325-1.257) and 0.540-1.352, MAE from 0.287-0.961 and 0.472-1.177, MAPE from 1.45-4.54 and 2.85-6.28, and SMAPE from 1.46-4.62 and 2.88-6.03 across various stress levels, respectively. DNN models, particularly N-BEATS and TCN, showed a 15% improvement in accuracy over traditional analytical models, effectively capturing complex temporal dependencies and patterns. This research significantly advances time series forecasting in geosciences, offering crucial insights for the safe and efficient management of underground storage in rock salt formations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.