ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep transfer learning approach for the classification of single and multiple power quality disturbances.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Power quality disturbances (PQDs) can significantly affect the reliability of electrical power systems, leading to potential equipment damage and operational inefficiencies. Accurate classification of these disturbances is essential for ensuring continuous and reliable service. The study proposes a deep transfer learning (TL) approach for PQD classification. In the proposed work, various single and multiple PQD signals pertaining to 15 different classes have been generated using mathematical models of PQDs adhering to the guidelines of the IEEE 1159 and IEC 61000-4-30 standards. Time-domain PQD signals are first converted into 2D color images using continuous wavelet transform (CWT). These images are then used to re-train modified pre-trained models such as GoogleNet, SqueezeNet, ResNet-18, and ShuffleNet on synthetic PQD data. Various single and combined PQDs are then classified using trained models. Moreover, the performance of the trained models is evaluated with the PQD signals containing noise of various signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), as well as PQD signals collected from the experimental setup in the laboratory. The results signify that the GoogleNet model exhibits consistent performance for classifying PQDs under various conditions, achieving classification accuracy of 99.8% for synthetic noiseless signals, 98.87% for signals with 20 dB SNR, and 98.89% for signals acquired through experimental setup. Furthermore, the trained models were tested using real-world PQD signals, comprising 26 sag and 42 impulse signals. The GoogleNet model achieved the highest classification accuracy, correctly identifying 23 sag and 34 impulse events, thereby demonstrating real-world applicability and robustness of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.