ArticleLearning & behavior2026
Reversal learning and aging: Exploring simple discrimination learning, learning-set, and functional classes.
Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive (or behavioral) flexibility is considered an executive function characterized by patterns of behavioral adjustment in response to changes in environmental demands, which tends to decline with aging. The simple discrimination reversal task is a useful way to evaluate this function, as it directly measures processes related to performance change, such as sensitivity to consequences, learning set formation, and concept formation. Few studies on aging have employed this task, and those that have did not examine its component processes or include middle-aged adults. This study aimed to evaluate cognitive flexibility and its component processes through a simple discrimination reversal task, applied to 100 participants divided into four age groups: emerging adults, younger adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults. After learning three simple simultaneous visual discriminations, the function of the positive and negative stimuli was reversed three times, with participants needing to meet a performance criterion each time. Older participants were more likely to fail to meet the performance criterion in some of the reversals, a pattern consistent with reduced sensitivity to consequences and failure in class formation. Moreover, older individuals who succeeded in the task learned the new function assigned to stimuli more slowly during reversals and were less likely to form classes in the second reversal. However, all participants who met the criterion across the three reversals showed evidence of learning-set formation, regardless of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41044263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.