Trial reportScientific reports2025
Goal-setting improves movement accuracy during unsupervised training in stroke patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of goal-directed rehabilitation on functional recovery in patients with cerebral infarction.Medicine · 2026Article
- Nursing strategies for severe poststroke fatigue: a case report of a structured, multidimensional intervention program.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot study investigated whether goal-setting leads to good behavioral performance and high motivation during an unsupervised reaching task in patients with subacute stroke. Using a single-blind, stratified randomized controlled design, 50 patients with unilateral upper-extremity motor paralysis were allocated to either a goal-setting group (n = 25) or a control group (n = 25) without goal setting. Both groups performed an unsupervised reaching task during a 15-minute session. The primary outcome measures included the total time spent in training and the success rate of reaching tasks. The secondary outcome was self-reported motivation assessed using a visual analog scale. Although there were no significant differences in the median [interquartile range] training time between goal-setting and control groups (636 [500-709] sec vs. 633 [494-715] sec, p = 0.771), the goal-setting group demonstrated significantly higher success rates than the control group (92.6 [82.9-96.0]% vs. 80.7 [65.4-92.6]%, p = 0.019). Self-reported motivation scores showed no significant differences between the groups (76 [60-95] vs. 84 [49-97], p = 0.994). These findings suggest that goal setting can help patients accurately perform reaching movements during unsupervised training, potentially enhancing the quality of motor performance in self-rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.