ArticleScientific reports2025
Estimation of sexual dimorphism of adult human mandibles of South Indian origin using non-metric parameters and machine learning classification algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mandible is one of the most reliable in sex determination in forensic anthropology. The shape of the mandible provides valuable information regarding the male and female distinctions. Machine learning algorithms are widely used for various applications due to their accuracy and reliability, extending their application in biological profiling. This study aims to estimate sexual dimorphism using various machine-learning algorithms based on non-metric features of the mandible. This study uses four machine-learning algorithms—k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, support vector machines, and random forest to determine sex based on 12 mandibular non-metric parameters. The data was collected from three medical institutes in Karnataka, India, involving a sample of 156 individuals. Random Forest consistently achieved the highest Jaccard Index (0.86), F1 score (0.92), and accuracy (0.92) across both SMOTE and Random Over-Sampling (ROS) methods, showing stable and robust performance. ROS improved balanced accuracy for KNN, Decision Tree, and SVM by up to 9.7%. Feature importance analysis highlighted N6 Gonial angle and N12 Flexure ramal post border as key predictors. Statistical tests found no significant accuracy differences among models. Female specificity remained lower across all models. This study offers insights into employing machine learning algorithms for sex identification using non-metric observations of the mandible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.