Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044202›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Children spontaneously discover efficient solutions to a difficult sorting task.

Huiwen Alex Yang, Bill D Thompson, Celeste Kidd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huiwen Alex YangDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. hw.yang@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0009-0007-4954-2416
Bill D Thompson *Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7348-3531
Celeste Kidd *Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient algorithms can enhance problem-solving in many cognitive domains but can be difficult to discover and use. For example, classical studies of seriation suggest that children struggle to apply algorithmic strategies in a simple sorting problem. We investigated the spontaneous discovery of algorithmic solutions across development. We gave children a variant of the sorting problem with hidden object ranks: children sort animated bunnies into the right order, from the shortest to the tallest, when the bunnies are standing behind a wall so their heights are not visible. Children performed far above chance on this difficult sorting task, potentially because higher demands in memory and reasoning incentivized strategic behaviours. Children also independently discovered at least two efficient algorithmic solutions to the sorting problem: selection sort and shaker sort. Additionally, our developmental results show that older children were more effective sorters than younger children and used efficient sorting algorithms more frequently. These results indicate that children are far more competent at applying algorithmic solutions to sorting tasks than previous research would suggest, and performance on sorting tasks improves throughout development. Our work demonstrates that children have the ability to spontaneously organize their behaviours and find effective solutions to challenges in the world.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChild DevelopmentProblem SolvingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.