ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainability and importance estimate of time series classifier via embedded neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feature-Level Fusion of Surface Electromyography and Mechanomyography Signals for MVC-Normalized Shoulder Abduction Force-Level Classification in Healthy Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A unified time series classification framework via adaptive Gaussian image representation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Digital Gait Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease: Subject-Wise Validated Explainable AI Framework Using Vertical Ground Reaction Force Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time series is common across disciplines, however the analysis of time series is not trivial due to inter- and intra-relationships between ordered data sequences. This imposes limitation upon the interpretation and importance estimate of the features within a time series. In the case of multivariate time series, these features are the individual time series and the time steps, which are intertwined. There exist many time series analyses, such as Autocorrelation and Granger Causality, which are based on statistic or econometric approaches. However analyses that can inform the importance of features within a time series are uncommon, especially with methods that utilise embedded methods of neural network (NN). We approach this problem by expanding upon our previous work, Pairwise Importance Estimate Extension (PIEE). We made adaptations toward the existing method to make it compatible with time series. This led to the formulation of aggregated Hadamard product, which can produce an importance estimate for each time point within a multivariate time series. This subsequently allows each time series within a multivariate time series to be interpreted as well. Within this work, we conducted an empirical study with univariate and multivariate time series, where we compared interpretation and importance estimate of features from existing embedded NN approaches, an explainable AI (xAI) approach, and our adapted PIEE approach. We verified interpretation and importance estimate via ground truth or existing domain knowledge when it is available. Otherwise, we conducted an ablation study by retraining the model with Leave-One-Out and Singleton feature subsets to see their contribution towards model performance. Our adapted PIEE method was able to produce various feature importance heatmaps and rankings inline with the ground truth, the existing domain knowledge or the ablation study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.