ArticleNature communications2025
All-optical voltage interrogation for probing synaptic plasticity in vivo.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for longitudinal two-photon calcium imaging and holographic optogenetic manipulation to investigate memory in mice.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Neural circuits encode prior knowledge of temporal statistics.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- STIMscope: centimeter-scale all-optical imaging and patterned optogenetic manipulation at single-cell resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Designer indicators for two-photon recording of subthreshold voltage dynamics.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Theoretical analysis of low-power optogenetic suppression of action potentials in human ventricular cardiomyocytes expressed with potassium-selective channelrhodopsins.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring synaptic efficacy and defining the rules for induction of synaptic plasticity at identified connections in the mammalian brain is essential for understanding how synapses contribute to learning and memory. This requires new approaches to selectively evoke presynaptic activity and measure postsynaptic responses with high spatiotemporal resolution and high sensitivity over long periods in vivo. Here we develop an all-optical approach to probe synaptic plasticity at identified cerebellar synapses in awake, behaving mice. We developed and applied JEDI-2Psub, a genetically encoded voltage indicator with increased sensitivity around resting membrane potentials, to record subthreshold and suprathreshold activity in Purkinje cell (PC) dendrites while selectively activating their granule cell (GrC) inputs using optogenetics and their climbing fiber (CF) inputs using sensory stimulation. We measured synaptic potentials and complex spike signals across the dendrites of multiple neighboring PCs, enabling us to examine correlations in voltage signals within and between neurons. We show how pairing GrC activity with sensory-evoked CF inputs can trigger long-term plasticity of inhibitory responses in PCs. These results provide a blueprint for defining the rules for plasticity induction at identified synapses in awake animals during behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.