Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identifying prenatal risk factors of postpartum depression with machine learning.

Lisette Sibbald, Marion I van den Heuvel, Marcel R Haas, Caspar J van Lissa, Hedwig J A van Bakel, Joran Jongerling, Lianne P Hulsbosch, Lotte Muskens, Myrthe G B M Boekhorst, Inga Schwabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisette SibbaldDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands. L.Sibbald@Tilburguniversity.edu.
Marion I van den HeuvelTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Marcel R HaasDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Caspar J van LissaDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Hedwig J A van BakelTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Joran JongerlingDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Lianne P HulsboschDepartment of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Lotte MuskensTranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Myrthe G B M BoekhorstDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Inga SchwabeDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Prof. Cobbenhagenlaan 125, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum depression (PPD), a common mental illness among mothers, can affect the well-being of both mothers and their children. Early intervention is essential but hindered by difficulties in identifying at-risk women, as it remains unclear how soon PPD can be predicted and which prenatal risk factors are most informative at each stage of pregnancy. We applied machine learning algorithms to (1) determine how early PPD can be predicted and (2) identify trimester-specific risk factors. The analysis leveraged data from 2865 mothers enrolled in the Brabant Study (Netherlands), including 233 psychological, biological, and social variables. A Lasso-regularized linear regression model trained on all trimesters performed best, identifying depressive symptoms during pregnancy, negative affectivity, neuroticism, body mass index, and history of mental health treatment as the most predictive risk factors. Although our predictive performance matched that of similar machine learning studies, high specificity but relatively low sensitivity indicates the model reliably excludes low-risk women but is less effective at detecting those who will develop PPD. Consistent performance across trimesters suggests low-risk status can be identified as early as 12 weeks. Clinicians could therefore use early-pregnancy data to rule out low-risk cases and allocate preventive resources more efficiently.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk FactorsYoung AdultMachine learningPostpartum depressionPPDPredictive risk factorsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41044170
PMCPMC12494919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.